Draft:Copyleaks

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Copyleaks
Type of site
SaaS for AI Content and Plagiarism Detection
Founded2015
HeadquartersStamford, CT
Area servedWorldwide
Founder(s)Alon Yamin and Yehonatan Bitton
CEOAlon Yamin
IndustryEducation
URLcopyleaks.com
RegistrationYes

Copyleaks is a plagiarism detection platform that uses artificial intelligence (AI) to identify similar and identical content across various formats.[1][2]

Copyleaks was founded in 2015 by Alon Yamin and Yehonatan Bitton, software developers working with text analysis, AI, machine learning, and other cutting-edge technologies.[1][2][3]

Copyleaks’ product suite is used by businesses, educational institutions, and individuals to identify potential plagiarism and AI-generated content in order to provide full transparency around responsible AI adoption.[4][5][6]

In 2022, Copyleaks raised $7.75 million to expand its anti-plagiarism capabilities.[7]

Functionality[edit]

Copyleaks is used in academia to detect plagiarism, paraphrasing, and potential copyright violations.[5][8][9] The release of AI models and rapid adoption has led to students increasingly using these tools to complete their work so Copyleaks helps to distinguish between content created by humans and content generated by AI.[5][8][9][10]

Plagiarism Detector[edit]

As generative AI becomes more commonplace, plagiarism is also a growing concern among schools, universities, and publishers.[10][11][12][13] Plagiarism Detector analyzes text to determine its authenticity and precision.[1][14][15][16]

Plagiarism Detector goes beyond the traditional method for determining plagiarism, which compares the text of a document word-by-word against a wide database of previously published articles and books.[14] [15][16] Instead, Copyleaks uses an AI model that comprehends the meaning of a document and even recognizes the writing style of its author so it is difficult for anyone to pass along plagiarized text as their own by simply changing a few words or phrases of a copied document.[14] [15]

AI Content Detector[edit]

Copyleaks uses advanced AI to detect AI-generated content and can help mitigate the challenges of academic integrity.[4][17] The tool can also highlight potentially paraphrased text to mask AI generation.[18]

Copyleaks claims a higher than 99% accuracy rate of detecting AI-generated content from models like ChatGPT, Copilot, GitHub, and Bard across 30 languages with a 0.2% false positive rate.[17][18][19][20][21][22] The AI Detector Chrome extension enables users to verify social media, news articles, review sites, Google documents, and other online content.[17][18][23]

In November 2023, a research team from the School of Education at the University of Adelaide found Copyleaks to be a reliable tool in an analysis of AI detection tools.[24][25] Copyleaks determined there was an 85.2% probability for AI content for a movie critique of House of Flying Daggers written like a 14-year-old school student, and a 73.1% probability for AI content for the essay even after it had been altered by a human.[24][25]

Codeleaks[edit]

The Codeleaks Source Code AI Detector can identify AI-generated code from ChatGPT, Google, Gemini, and GitHub Copilot.[26][27] The detector can spot if code has been plagiarized or modified and provides any key licensing details.[26][27] Codeleaks looks at the semantic structures of code to determine whether it has been potentially paraphrased to determine its originality and integrity.[27][28]

Generative AI Governance and Compliance[edit]

Regulations are necessary to provide guardrails for AI use.[29][30][31] Copyleaks can help enterprises create enterprise-wide policies to ensure safe and responsible AI use.[29][30]

Criticism[edit]

In June 2023, an international team of academics found AI detection tools inaccurate and unreliable.[32][33] In an analysis of five AI content detection tools – Copyleaks, OpenAI, Writer, GPTZero, and CrossPlag – Copyleaks struggled with sensitivity, that is, the proportion of AI-generated content correctly identified by the detectors out of all AI-generated content.[33] Copyleaks had the highest sensitivity at 93% for content generated by ChatGPT 4.[33][34]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c "Profile of a Founder: Alon Yamin of Copyleaks". Tech Tribune. 17 March 2020. Retrieved 1 May 2024.
  2. ^ a b "Enhancing Academic Integrity Guardrails with AI Detection". Bloomberg. Retrieved 1 May 2024.
  3. ^ Deborah, Balshem. "Copyleaks mulls potential Series B for AI-generated content detection". Mergermarket. Retrieved 1 May 2024.
  4. ^ a b "Open LMS Partners With Copyleaks, Adding Advanced AI-Driven Plagiarism and AI Content Detection". eSchool News. 8 June 2023. Retrieved 1 May 2024.
  5. ^ a b c "Artificial intelligence: Will it soon take the place of plagiarism?". District Administration. 3 April 2024. Retrieved 1 May 2024.
  6. ^ "AI Governance: Using AI Responsibly In Marketing". Leader Generation Podcast. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
  7. ^ Tiffany & Steven, Hsu & Myers (May 18, 2023). "Another Side of the A.I. Boom: Detecting What A.I. Makes". The New York Times. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
  8. ^ a b "Open LMS Partners with AI Detector to Combat Plagiarism". Campus Technology. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
  9. ^ a b "60% GPT-3.5 Outputs Plagiarised, Raises Copyright Concerns: Study". Business World. Retrieved 4 May 2024.
  10. ^ a b Kornick, Lindsay (3 January 2024). "AI platform CEO talks new tech detecting plagiarism following Harvard scandal: 'As prevalent as ever'". Fox News. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
  11. ^ Petrosyan, Vahan (3 February 2023). "AI Generated Content Detection Software: Can They Detect ChatGPT?". Retrieved 2 May 2024.
  12. ^ Morrone, Megan. "New report: 60% of OpenAI model's responses contain plagiarism". Axios. Retrieved 4 May 2024.
  13. ^ Spiro, James (3 September 2020). "BACK TO SCHOOL: 7 Israeli companies helping the world's students learn from afar". CTech.
  14. ^ a b c Kumar, Anmol (16 December 2020). "Remote Learning And How It Is Causing An Uptick In Online Cheating". eLearning Industry. Retrieved 3 May 2024.
  15. ^ a b c Bray, Hiawatha. "Plagiarism accusations are everywhere. Here's how detection software works". The Boston Globe. Retrieved 5 May 2024.
  16. ^ a b "AI-generated content detection tools put to the test". VentureBeat. March 2023. Retrieved 3 May 2024.
  17. ^ a b c Abdullahi, Aminu (23 January 2024). "12 Best AI Detectors for 2024". Retrieved 4 May 2024.
  18. ^ a b c Clark, Elijah. "The 10 Greatest AI Content Detector Tools". Forbes. Retrieved 3 May 2024.
  19. ^ Pileiro, Frank (6 February 2024). "Educator Edtech Review: Copyleaks AI Content Detector". Tech & Learning. Retrieved 8 May 2024.
  20. ^ Johnson, Arianna. "New Tool Can Tell If Something Is AI-Written With 99% Accuracy". Forbes. Retrieved 8 May 2024.
  21. ^ Simone, Stephanie. "Copyleaks offers a plagiarism detection platform, an AI-generated source code detector". KMWorld. Retrieved 9 May 2024.
  22. ^ "Top 12 AI Detection Tools". TechRound. 24 January 2024. Retrieved 9 May 2024.
  23. ^ Nine, Adrianna. "Meta Will Begin Labeling AI-Generated Content. Is It Enough to Combat Misinformation?". ExtremeTech. Retrieved 9 May 2024.
  24. ^ a b Lee & Palmer (17 November 2023). "How hard can it be? Testing the dependability of AI detection tools". Times Higher Education. Retrieved 18 May 2024.
  25. ^ a b Coffey, Lauren. "Professors Cautious of Tools to Detect AI-Generated Writing". Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved 18 May 2024.
  26. ^ a b Shankland, Stephen. "ChatGPT: A GPT-4 Turbo Upgrade and Everything Else to Know". CNET. Retrieved 12 May 2024.
  27. ^ a b c Gutierrez, Daniel (March 2024). "Generative AI Report – 3/1/2024". insideBIGDATA. Retrieved 12 May 2024.
  28. ^ Lucariello, Kate. "Moodle Partners with Copyleaks to Detect AI Content, Interspersed Human/AI Content, and Plagiarism". Campus Technology. Retrieved 15 May 2024.
  29. ^ a b Dotson, Ky (28 March 2024). "Biden administration unveils new AI safeguard rules for federal use". SiliconANGLE. Retrieved 16 May 2024.
  30. ^ a b "How AI Is Used in Plagiarism Detection". Info-Tech Research Group. Retrieved 16 May 2024.
  31. ^ O'Hare, Claire. "Here Are The Strengths And Weaknesses of Biden's Tech Executive Order". MSN. Retrieved 16 May 2024.
  32. ^ Weber-Wulff, Anohina-Naumeca, Bjelobaba, Foltýnek, Guerrero-Dib, Popoola, Šigut, Waddington (21 June 2023). "Testing of Detection Tools for AI-Generated Text". International Journal for Educational Integrity. 19 (1): 26. arXiv:2306.15666. doi:10.1007/s40979-023-00146-z.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  33. ^ a b c Elkhatat, Elsaid & Almeer (1 September 2023). "Evaluating the efficacy of AI content detection tools in differentiating between human and AI-generated text". International Journal for Educational Integrity. 19 (17). doi:10.1007/s40979-023-00140-5.
  34. ^ Gewirtz, David. "Can AI detectors save us from ChatGPT? I tried 5 online tools to find out". ZDNET. Retrieved 20 May 2024.

External links[edit]

This page will be placed in the following categories if it is moved to the article namespace.
Categories:

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Copyleaks&oldid=1225148352"