Talk:Ganjar Pranowo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 05:16, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Closed at nominator's request

Ganjar Pranowo
Ganjar Pranowo
  • Comment: Most of the videos on his channel are CC licensed. A more hooky face would be appreciated.

5x expanded by Khalif Ali Husain the Third (talk). Nominated by Jeromi Mikhael at 09:19, 2 September 2021 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: No - /
  • Other problems: No - /

Image eligibility:

QPQ: No - /

Overall:

This nomination has a lot of issues unfortunately. There are a couple of paragraphs with no sources, and it might not be neutral because it spends so much time on the porn controversy. I'm not sure if there should be so much weight on that. The hooks are cited but they're a little bit of a BLP issue because they're all about the porn.

The photo is pretty blurry and not in the article. I'm not sure why because there's a lot of really good professional photos already on the page (and they're free to use). QPQ also has to be done since the nominator has over 5 dyk credits.

The page was recently expanded and is long enough, so if those issues can be fixed within a few days the nomination can be approved but if not it's better to reject it now.

Closing this nomination per the nominator's request. BuySomeApples (talk) 18:36, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@BuySomeApples: Nope, just close it now. Go ahead Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 00:59, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This needs to be closed per the nominator's request. BuySomeApples (talk) 03:04, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Massive removal of Controversy section[edit]

@Nico Delano, Jeromi Mikhael, Asphonixm, and 180.252.165.252: Pinging prominent editors in the last months. Could someone explain the massive removal of Controversy section? Those section are well sourced and quite neutral, removal of them with just "Delete" and no discussion in Talk page could be construed as vandalism. Thank you. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:04, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2018 official portrait[edit]

Something strange is going on with the official 2018 portrait (also used as the header image). A completely different person is shown in the 2018 portrait vs. the earlier one. Either a different person posed for the second photograph, or someone used AI to alter the image and uploaded the doctored photo. Does the Indonesian-language version of this page have a similar discrepancy with these images? Either the fake photo needs to be taken down or there needs to be an explanation of this obvious fake. Ars Magna Hirschfeld (talk) 16:11, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The photo is taken from the official site. I didn't think it's a different person. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:01, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]