Talk:Joan Ruddock

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

Politics of the United Kingdom Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments on Partha Dasgupta, Robert Mendelsohn, William Nordhaus, Richard Tol, Martin Weitzman and Gary Yohe[edit]

I propose that the sentence about Ruddock's views on these ecomonists be deleted. I have already deleted references to this point on the respective pages for each of them: quite aside from the obvious NPOV issues, with the best will in the world, Ruddock's views are not of sufficient weight to merit inclusion on Wikipedia.

It is slightly different of course on the page about Ruddock herself: a reference to her views on a given topic will not raise the same NPOV issues.

That said, are the contents of a departmental memorandum of sufficient importance to warrant inclusion? If they are, then the article should perhaps set out more clearly why this is the case.

Informed Owl (talk) 14:34, 5 May 2008 (UTC)Informed Owl[reply]

I think that relevance depends on the context. It seems to me that you were quite right to remove this info from the articles on the economists, but that's a difft matter from having it here.

As with most MPs, Ruddock's article is regrettably stubby for someone with 21 years in the House of Commons and several years of public prominence before then. It tells us very little about what she thinks or does, and while this snippet may be a little obscure, at least it says something about her current stance. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:02, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the response. I am glad I asked first rather than just deleting as I had with the other references. I agree with you that the article is stubby. It was partly why the quotation really stood out so much: in a very short article covering quite a long public life, the very specific reference to these economists seemed unduly prominent.

Another point occurs to me. The quotation "a fundamental misunderstanding of the role of formal, highly aggregated economic modelling in evaluating a policy issue" comes from the briefing note attached to Ruddock's letter. It was prepared by departmental officials, not by her. While she can probably be taken to have accepted the contents of the briefing (why else send it on?), essentially what we have is one sentence taken from a 5 page note which was sent to Ruddock being taken to be of sufficient importance to warrant inclusion in the article about her. Informed Owl (talk) 16:25, 6 May 2008 (UTC)Informed Owl[reply]

Having just read Ruddock's letter and the start of the briefing notes, I think you are right that this item should be deleted. Even if the subject of that correspondence is relevant, that point is a bizarre way of summarising it, and the substance of the it is "Minister's correspondence defends the Stern review against critics", which is about as surprising as noting that she has an office in westmninster. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:57, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I like the way you put it! For the record, I have deleted the following comment:

"She has argued that the economists Partha Dasgupta, Robert Mendelsohn, William Nordhaus, Richard Tol, Martin Weitzman and Gary Yohe suffer from "a fundamental misunderstanding of the role of formal, highly aggregated economic modelling in evaluating a policy issue""

together with this link to the letter and briefing notes to which I and BrownHairedGirl have referred: http://www.fnu.zmaw.de/fileadmin/fnu-files/publication/tol/Ruddock.pdf Informed Owl (talk) 22:25, 6 May 2008 (UTC)Informed Owl[reply]

[edit]

"She is a feminist". Well, I'm enlightened. 90.201.20.243 (talk) 11:46, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joan Ruddock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101202221059/http://www.privy-council.org.uk/files/word/LIST%209%20June%202010.doc to http://www.privy-council.org.uk/files/word/LIST%209%20June%202010.doc

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:14, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Joan Ruddock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:55, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]