User talk:Co1umbus

This is Co1umbus's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carol A. Mullen (August 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I think there has been some attempt at creating inline citations, but they are not done correctly, please see WP:REFB for advice. See also WP:YFA for help on article creation in general.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Carol A. Mullen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:43, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Co1umbus! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:43, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Carol A. Mullen has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Carol A. Mullen. Thanks! asilvering (talk) 23:27, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings!

You've been very helpful with your suggestions in the past. First, a big thank you! Second, I have a citation and referencing question that's been tough to answer. Any thoughts?

In the body of my Wikipedia page draft I say that a person has won numerous awards. This comment refers to an entire later section titled Recent Awards and not to just one award in its list. How do I do this in Wikipedia? In both Word and Acrobat one would first create a target, like the words "Recent Awards," and then create a hyperlink earlier in the document to the target. Is this allowable in Wikipedia?

Thanks again for your insights and help,

Bill Co1umbus (talk) 18:10, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How to create references[edit]

Dear @Co1umbus:

I came across your account and your draft by the teahouse. Your draft looks quite good in that it has suitable references. However, it would come closer to acceptance if you improve the format you use to cite references.

Right now, I see that you are using a format like '''<sup>[17]</sup>'''. This is not a useful format. For the in-text citation, please use <ref> YOUR_SOURCE </ref>.

For example, one of your sources would look like <ref>{{Cite book |last=Fletcher2 |first=S. |title=The SAGE handbook of mentoring and coaching in education |last2=Mullen |first2=C. A. |publisher=[[Sage]] |year=2012 |isbn=0857027530}}</ref>. If I put it in this text, it would look like this.^[1]

Referencing is a fine art. I encourage you to read Wikipedia:Citing sources. Another good way to learn references is to look at the source code of some good articles and some feature articles on similar subjects (in your case, it is professors, educators, and scientists). Have a look at Albert Einstein.

Cheers, -- TheLonelyPather (talk) 01:18, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks LonelyPather

Your feedback from a few days ago was very helpful and encouraging. I have a citation and referencing question that's been tough to answer. Any thoughts?

In the body of my Wikipedia page draft I say that a person has won numerous awards. This comment refers to an entire later section titled Recent Awards and not to just one award in its list. How do I do this in Wikipedia? In both Word and Acrobat one would first create a target, like the words "Recent Awards," and then create a hyperlink earlier in the document to the target. Is this allowable in Wikipedia?

Thanks again for your insights and help,

Bill

Co1umbus (talk) 01:35, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Bill,

Let me try to go through your response.

In the body of my Wikipedia page draft I say that a person has won numerous awards. I don't see where you say that the person "has won numerous awards" in the draft. Please kindly provide a quote.
an entire later section titled Recent Awards The "recent awards" section you mentioned is under the "references" section. If you intend to use them as references, please write some prose in the body of the article and use reference templates to cite these links. Consider the following format:

At [TIME], [NAME] has won [AWARD] for [FACT]... ^[2]

If you do not intend to use these awards as references, please do not put them under the "references" section. The "references" section should display only the footnotes or the sources you refer to.

I encourage you to apply proper in-text citation in my previous comment. I see that you have used some {{cite book}} parameters. However, note well that these <ref> are in-text citations, meaning that these refs go into the body of the text, not in the reference section.

This is a complex issue and I see that you are making a bit of progress. Have you looked into how the Albert Einstein article cites its sources? Please also read WP:INCITE on how to use <ref> and the named references feature.

You are making progress. Please be patient and careful.

Cheers, -- TheLonelyPather (talk) 03:03, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On a second note, please consider going through Help:Introduction. TheLonelyPather (talk) 03:05, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I appreciate your encouragement! Co1umbus (talk) 01:03, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carol A. Mullen has been accepted[edit]

Carol A. Mullen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 16:22, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

^ Fletcher2, S.; Mullen, C. A. (2012). The SAGE handbook of mentoring and coaching in education. Sage. ISBN 0857027530.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
^ Example reference.

[1] Fletcher2, S.; Mullen, C. A. (2012). The SAGE handbook of mentoring and coaching in education. Sage. ISBN 0857027530.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)

[2] Example reference.

[1]

[2]