User talk:Dheeraj1012

Welcome![edit]

Hi Dheeraj1012! I would like to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:55, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 16:04, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MrOllie I understand, but all those specifications were collected from the manufacturer in person by me, also I tested them. Dheeraj1012 (talk) 16:12, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your effort, but we cannot accept contributions based on your personal collection or testing. Wikipedia is based on published sources from widely used publishers. MrOllie (talk) 16:17, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MrOllie Okay, thank you. Dheeraj1012 (talk) 03:24, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Hemiauchenia (talk) 05:44, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hemiauchenia

yes, can you please tell me what I have edited? what page? Dheeraj1012 (talk) 05:47, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Babri Masjid page. It's somewhat confusing, but the "India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan" topic means any article related to either of the 3 countries, and the Babri Masjid clearly falls under the "India" part of the topic area. Picking such a contentious article as a newbie editor probably isn't the best idea, and I suggest you find a less contentious article to edit. Hemiauchenia (talk) 05:49, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hemiauchenia

Yes but ASI has proven that a temple existed underneath babri Masjid. Dheeraj1012 (talk) 05:53, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The ASI report has been contested. Indian courts are also not reliable sources for archaeological claims. Hemiauchenia (talk) 05:56, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hemiauchenia

No, do you find Hindu inscriptions on Masjid? or "ram" in sanskrit, wrote in MASJID? and mainly there WAS AN TEMPLE in ayodhya because (as per ramyan) lord Rama was born there. Where is that? And why babri Masjid having suspicious structure under it? because it has been built on an demolished Hindu temple. which is Ram Mandir. Dheeraj1012 (talk) 06:01, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hemiauchenia

Oh okay, so CAN YOU provide RELIABLE SOURCES?

WHAT'S RELIABLE SOURCES ACCORDING TO YOU? Dheeraj1012 (talk) 06:02, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hemiauchenia

Proves:

Pillars and Temple Artifacts: ASI found 50 pillar bases that were in alignment with the temple architecture tradition. These pillars were made of stone and were similar to those found in Hindu temples of that era.Bricks with Hindu Symbols: Several bricks recovered from the site had carvings of Hindu symbols like lotus flowers, Kaustubh jewel, and divine kalash (pitcher). These symbols are associated with Hindu religious structures.Terracotta Figurines: ASI unearthed terracotta figurines depicting Hindu deities and motifs, further indicating the presence of a Hindu temple complex.Structural Remains: The excavation revealed a 50-metre-long wall made of bricks and stones, believed to be part of the ancient temple structure.Burnt and Charred Remains: ASI discovered burnt and charred remains of structures, which are consistent with historical records of the temple being destroyed and rebuilt in the past.North-South Orientation: The orientation of the structure, aligned north-south, was characteristic of Hindu temples, unlike the east-west orientation typical of Islamic structures.Sculptures and Inscriptions: Sculptures of divine beings like apsaras and gods, along with inscriptions in Sanskrit and Devanagari script, were found during the excavations.

Yoni-Patta and Circular Shrine: ASI found a yoni-patta (symbolizing the divine feminine) and remnants of a circular shrine, which are significant elements of Hindu temple architecture.Water Tank and Drainage System: The discovery of a water tank and a sophisticated drainage system, typical of ancient Hindu temples, further supports the presence of a temple complex.Sculpted Panels: Numerous sculpted panels depicting scenes from Hindu mythology, such as the Ramayana, were unearthed, indicating the religious and cultural significance of the site to Hindus.Pottery and Ceramic Artifacts: ASI recovered pottery shards and ceramic artifacts with Hindu motifs and designs, providing additional evidence of a pre-existing Hindu settlement or temple.Radiocarbon Dating: Scientific analysis, including radiocarbon dating of organic materials found at the site, supported the antiquity of the structures and artifacts associated with the Hindu temple.Local Tradition and Historical Accounts: ASI considered local traditions, historical accounts, and records from travelers and historians dating back centuries that mentioned a temple dedicated to Lord Ram at the disputed site.

Moldings and Decorative Elements: ASI discovered intricate moldings and decorative elements characteristic of Hindu temple architecture, including friezes, cornices, and motifs like kalash (pitcher) and amalaka (ornamental disk).Apsidal Structure: Uncovering an apsidal structure, a semi-circular or polygonal architectural feature commonly found in ancient Hindu temples, provided further architectural evidence.Perforated Screens (Jali): The presence of perforated stone screens (jali) with floral and geometric designs indicated the influence of Hindu craftsmanship on the site.Votive Offerings: ASI found votive offerings such as terracotta lamps, miniature shrines, and religious artifacts commonly associated with Hindu religious practices.Bronze Artifacts: Discoveries of bronze artifacts, including idols and ritual objects, added to the material evidence of a Hindu religious presence at the site.Step Well or Kunda: Evidence of a step well or kunda, a water reservoir used for ceremonial purposes in Hindu rituals, suggested the site's use for religious activities.Alignment with Cardinal Directions: The orientation of the structures and features aligned with the cardinal directions, a common practice in Hindu temple construction for cosmic alignment.Potsherds with Inscriptions: ASI recovered potsherds with inscriptions in Sanskrit or ancient scripts, possibly containing religious verses or references to the deity worshipped at the site.Terracotta Tiles: Excavations revealed terracotta tiles with intricate designs and patterns, similar to those used in ancient Hindu temples for flooring and decoration.Underground Chambers: Discovery of underground chambers or cellars, which are often associated with the storage of religious offerings or sacred objects in Hindu temples.Sculptures of Deities: ASI unearthed sculptures and idols of Hindu deities like Lord Vishnu, Lord Shiva, and Goddess Lakshmi, indicating the religious significance of the site.Epigraphical Records: ASI examined epigraphical records, including inscriptions and stone carvings, that referenced the temple's history and patronage by rulers or benefactors. Dheeraj1012 (talk) 05:50, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There have been various criticism of the report see [1] and [2], we can't take the ASI view as fact when it has been contested. Hemiauchenia (talk) 05:55, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hemiauchenia

There are literal images to prove. please check the internet. some historical figures also mentioned about Ram mandir in Ayodhya in their auto biographies. Dheeraj1012 (talk) 05:58, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Hemiauchenia (talk) 06:11, 7 May 2024 (UTC) to do so.[reply]

@Hemiauchenia

what exactly you want to tell? Dheeraj1012 (talk) 06:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you take part in that discussion Doug Weller talk 11:43, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Babri Masjid. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Kautilya3 (talk) 15:20, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You've said "some archaeologists"[edit]

What is your source for that? You either need to source it directly or name a few. Doug Weller talk 16:34, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]