User talk:Linexrecords

This is Linexrecords's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abdul Sattar Mahomed (May 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still written inappropriately. Read WP:PEACOCK.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abdul Sattar Mahomed and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 09:46, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Linexrecords! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 09:46, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abdul Sattar Mahomed (May 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is better, but is still needs some work on the language. You should only be writing factually. Please also see WP:NMUSICIAN.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abdul Sattar Mahomed and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 10:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abdul Sattar Mahomed (May 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Grabup was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It require multiple in-depth covarage from independent reliable sources to establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abdul Sattar Mahomed and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GrabUp - Talk 11:28, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abdul Sattar Mahomed (May 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by UtherSRG was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

UtherSRG (talk) 11:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Alexf^(talk) 11:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Linexrecords", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it sounds like a company. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. Secretlondon (talk) 11:47, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Linexrecords. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Abdul Sattar Mahomed, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Linexrecords. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Linexrecords|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:55, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Linexrecords, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Linexrecords|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 12:12, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The editor has responded below that they ar not paid: "I am not paid ediotr neither am i a record label, i am an independant indavidual Linexrecords (talk) 12:22, 20 May 2024 (UTC)" and we accept this simple declaration. Thank you for making it 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:25, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So can you look into my submisison again? as the first admin told me some issues, i imporved and then after was tol;d it was better and to remove peackock terms and unverified things and so i did an dthen once i done that some other admin came and said rejetced. thats really unfair and really unprofessional Linexrecords (talk) 12:27, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They just don't meet the musician inclusion criteria, sorry. Secretlondon (talk) 12:32, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for all your assistance. apologies for the trouble Linexrecords (talk) 12:41, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your article[edit]

Hi. We have very strict rules about which musicians can get an article on wikipedia. The criteria are here: WP:MUSICIAN. The guy you are writing about does not seem famous enough to meet the criteria. Generally anyone eligible will have been written about in lots and lots of places - not just the local press. Please don't resubmit the same thing as you'll just irritate our volunteer assessors.

Also your name makes it sound like you are a record label. We don't allow people to edit on behalf of companies. Would you like to change your name? Thanks for understanding our anti-spam/promotion rules. Secretlondon (talk) 11:46, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Even if you change your name, the question about paid editing is mandatory for you to answer. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:11, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not paid ediotr neither am i a record label, i am an independant indavidual Linexrecords (talk) 12:22, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then you need to change your name as you sound like a record label. Secretlondon (talk) 12:31, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your account has been blocked from editing because your username gives the impression that the account represents a group, club, organization, company, or website. Your username is the principal reason for the block. You are welcome to continue editing after you have chosen a new username that complies with Wikipedia's username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable, regardless of the username that you choose. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid or compensated in any way, you must disclose who is paying you to edit here. You may also read our FAQ for article subjects

Please take a moment to either create a new account, or request a username change. The new username that you choose must represent you as an individual person, and it must comply with Wikipedia's username policy.

To create a new account with a different username, simply log out of this account and then make a new one.
If you prefer to change the username on this account, you may do so by adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page (this page): {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Please also note that you are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it also identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".

Appeals: If your username does not represent a group, organization, website, or other entity described above, and if you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Thank you.

— The Anome (talk) 15:29, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]