User talk:Maria1718182

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Maria1718182! Your additions to Vittoria Ceretti have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 23:23, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

thank you very much.Im new so I didnt know Maria1718182 (talk) 23:24, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hi Maria1718182! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Tacyarg (talk) 00:14, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

March 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Irina Shayk, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Yamla (talk) 12:42, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

im sorry but she is known as a supermodel worldwide so I thought it wpuld be smart to change how she is known.Plus it didnt ask for sources. Maria1718182 (talk) 14:21, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

It doesn't matter if "it didnt ask for sources", it is your responsibility to cite your changes. See WP:CITE. You must do this in the future. Your edits so far have been inappropriate and must not continue. --Yamla (talk) 16:50, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Oh please define what inappropriate is and come back later Maria1718182 (talk) 17:08, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Please read WP:V and WP:NOR. --Yamla (talk) 17:35, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

April 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. --Yamla (talk) 12:18, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Almost all of your edits are actively harmful to Wikipedia, not to mention your violations of WP:SOCK. You are very, very close to an indefinite block. Please stop editing, step back, and take the time to read and understand our policies. If you continue making harmful edits, I will block you indefinitely. --Yamla (talk) 12:20, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Hello.I'm a fashion person and I understand fashion really well and I wanted to correct some things at the Gigi Hadid's page( her vogue covers and her height)

https://fashionista.com/2016/04/gigi-hadid-every-vogue-cover

Before wanting to edit it I wanted to ask you If the page that I sent now is a relatable article.Because I'm sure that she has made more than 35 Vogue appearances.Thank you for your time. Maria1718182 (talk) 08:28, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

July 2023

Hi Maria1718182! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 13:56, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eugenia Volodina, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Russian and Agency. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for the information. Maria1718182 (talk) 17:20, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. Hipal (talk) 19:11, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Maria1718182. Thank you for your work on May Tager. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:52, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lucy Markovic

Hello, Maria1718182

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username SunDawn, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Lucy Markovic, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:37, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

I believe you're right.I thought that the information would be more diverse but it isn't. Maria1718182 (talk) 13:52, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sofia Steinberg

Hello Maria1718182,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sofia Steinberg for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

CurryTime7-24 (talk) 18:47, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Maria1718182. Thank you for your work on Sofia Steinberg. CurryTime7-24, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Article does not cite any reliable secondary sources that establish subject's notability per WP:BASIC. An online search turned up nothing. If these exist, please do include them.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|CurryTime7-24}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

CurryTime7-24 (talk) 18:53, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Sofia Steinberg

Hello Maria1718182, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Sofia Steinberg, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sofia Steinberg.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|CurryTime7-24}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

CurryTime7-24 (talk) 21:03, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Sofia Steinberg for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sofia Steinberg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sofia Steinberg (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dennis Brown - 2¢ 10:31, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

April 2024

Please refrain from restoring your own edits, unless you can verify with mutiple and/or reliable sources that the information you've added is correct. As the people above me have stated already, take the time to read the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources, Wikipedia: Verifiability and Wikipedia: Reliable sources. Thanks Közinde (talk) 21:58, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

First of all the source was reliable enough. His own interview that he gaze for the magazine Numèro. You claimed you couldn't open the page yet for me it worked perfectly fine. I double check my sources and if you don't know, Numèro is one of the most reliable because it's a fashion magazine. Maria1718182 (talk) 08:38, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

I never clamed the page wouldn't open. What I did say was the neither of those sources you've had added after restoring your own edit was verifiable. Not one source had an existing page, which is the reason why I undid it in the first place. Whatever Numéro interview you want to add is your choice, just make sure you do it correctly by double-checking the links--no Numéro interview was added as far as I know. Especially the one you published on my own talk page. Közinde (talk) 09:10, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

I just checked and the interview was literally Numèro Netherlands the same link I sent you, source number 10. Then source Number 11 is his biography and then source number 1, is models.com. All the links seem to work perfectly fine. What doesn't seem to work are the further sources added below which I haven't added, or made an edit. They were there, and the link there doesn't work, the page just doesn't exist anymore. Maria1718182 (talk) 11:30, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

I deleted sources 14 and 15 (the 'last two sources' that were broken), which based on the browse and ref history, was added by you. Source 11 is not trustworthy, since it is a website that tracks your music, and everyone can edit it to their own beliefs. I did notice that sources 8 and 9 were also gone (which was done by reverting the full edit), that wasnt badly sourced, so thanks for mentioning that. As stated in my own talk page, I will be deleting the latter sources. Feel free to change that when you find the right sources. Until then please avoid the constant reverting, communicating is a better way to resolve the issue. Közinde (talk) 11:50, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Ways to improve Caroline Ribeiro

Hello, Maria1718182,

Thank you for creating Caroline Ribeiro.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

some links can be combined into one reference at the bottom

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Oaktree b}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Oaktree b (talk) 04:57, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Gigi Hadid

Please do edit articles to reflect your own point of view, or your own personal analysis, as you did to Gigi Hadid. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. [1] [2] [3] --Hipal (talk) 17:20, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

I remember adding her net worth, and it was a reliable source in my opinion. The same thing was done at Claudia Schiffer's page as well. Also as for Hadid being a Muslim I don't recall her saying anything like her sister did. Therefore I request that such statement should be reviewed. Faith is something personal, I'd accept it if she said it herself but the source hasn't given such information and just because she celebrates Ramadan doesn't make her a muslim since she celebrates Christmas as well.Maria1718182 (talk) 10:10, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation.

There's already information in the lede about her income, which is already problematic because there is no corresponding content in the article body. Adding still more to the lede just makes the problem worse.

As for being Muslim, The Guardian is fine for such a statement. If can find something of similar quality that goes into the nuances of her religious beliefs vs cultural upbringing, we should address them then. --Hipal (talk) 17:18, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

I read the article but only Bella's quote was mentioned? Also as far as I can remember Gigi has never said anything about faith and their parents separated pretty early. The children mostly lived with their mother since they were in different states. I think it'd a bit inaccurate, she has stood up for the rights of the Palestinians and immigrants but has never openly said she's a Muslim unlike Bella. It's just the sources claiming it. Maria1718182 (talk) 17:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)