User talk:Migfab008

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Migfab008, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! P 1 9 9   13:23, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you![edit]

Thank you

SBVels (talk) 06:08, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

National varieties of English[edit]

Information icon Hello. In a recent edit, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 12:04, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Babel[edit]

I think you should change it from Tagalog to Filipino. Jleo22 (talk) 14:53, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not disruptive edits[edit]

Hello, my edits are not disruptive. The pictures used on the Wikipedia pages were stolen from my sister who owns that picture. I was trying to give credit where credit is due. Also, I am knowledgeable in textiles as my said sister owns a fashion brand using those textiles. Excuse me for not including a proper source yet. 2601:205:4100:CA:45A8:203D:B7B2:A90 (talk) 13:15, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Script-assisted fixes[edit]

Hi there! Can you make sure your script isn't changing dates in the references, titles of external web pages, and adding spelling errors? Thank you! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 01:11, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(comment in non-admin capacity) Hi, Migfab. Echoing Ed's point from last month, could you please be more careful in your usage of the OVERLINK script? It's a very opinionated script, and its author's definition of "overlinkng" is significantly broader than what MOS:OVERLINK actually says. For instance, here, "Massachusetts" and "New York (state)" are overlinked, but New York City is not. Here, "assault" is a reasonable link because it helps the reader understand what crime Murray was charged with. (Something like Alice assaulted Bob, on the other hand, might be overlinked.) Here, most removals are valid, but "per capita income" and "poverty line" are relatively technical terms that should definitely be linked.

These scripts you're using are highly context-sensitive, and meant to be used by editors with a strong grasp of the relevant guidelines and norms. There's a reason that we generally don't allow bots to perform such tasks. There are many variations as to why it might or migt not be appropriate to link to a term; another way to look at it is that there is no term that it would categorically be overlinking to link to. If you're not yet an expert on these nuances, that's fine! I definitely wasn't when my account was 7 months old. Or 7 years old, probably, honestly. But please understand that in a lot of cases you're editing articles that much thought has gone into the presentation of, and that you should fully familiarize yourself with the context in which a link appears before removing it as overlinked.

Happy editing. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 23:02, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Scripting error[edit]

Hello, happy new year! Your recent edit on Nabunturan changed an image's size syntax from 120x80px (valid syntax) to 120x80p (invalid syntax), and made the image show at 100% size, filling and breaking the page. Letting you know so that you can adjust any further scripting you do to avoid repeating such problematic errors. Thanks, Zinnober9 (talk) 04:36, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Zinnober9. Thank you for the message and a happy new year! Migfab008 (talk) 05:31, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AIV reporting[edit]

Hi – Thanks for editing Wikipedia. I want to talk to you about this report you made to AIV today on John Mikael Castro.

The last edit this user made to the encyclopedia was at 2306 GMT on January 15. Here's what you did after they'd been inactive for more than twelve hours:

  • You warned them at 1233 GMT today about an edit to List of programs broadcast by GMA News TV International. That edit was made on January 2.
  • You then warned the user two minutes later about an edit they made on December 31.
  • You next warned the user one minute after that about an edit they made over 24 hours prior.
  • You gave a level 4 final warning four minutes later about an edit they made a little less than 24 hours ago.
  • After waiting another four minutes, you reported them to AIV.

That's four warnings and an AIV report in a space of eleven minutes about edits that are stale at best.

Do you think we don't notice that kind of thing? It's entirely inappropriate to go back through an editor's contributions, pick out old diffs, give warnings when the editor isn't even active, and then report them to AIV. Besides wasting our time, this could be considered hounding, and we take that very seriously. I don't care if you just found their problematic edits. AIV reports are to prevent disruption, not to assuage your ego or your annoyance at the trouble you've had to go to to fix it.

I've looked at your previous AIV reports and they seem fine, so I don't know if this was an honest mistake or something else. Regardless, consider this your only warning: don't do it again. I've worked AIV for more than 15 years, so believe me when I tell you that repeated bad reports to AIV are a ticket to ANI, and you don't want any part of ANI.

We appreciate your vigilance, but dial it back just a skosh. Thanks. Katietalk 16:26, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Changing "Philippine pages"[edit]

Whatever is called Philippine English, I don't it them improved by you. Philippine dates can be dmy or mdy, there isn't a national date.

And "Philippine English". What is that? I don't know what it is, but I certainly know what it isn't. I guess it's for pages actually written by Philippine editor, not any page with the word Philippine inside it. Auntie Kathleen (talk) 13:58, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jock Semple dates[edit]

Hello,

You created: Special:PermanentLink/1130639034, citing "(script-assisted date audit and style fixes per MOS:NUM, American English)". Here's a thing to think about.

If you read Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Dates_and_numbers#Consistency carefully, you'll see that the manual of style specifies that the "Access and archive dates in an article's citations should all use the same format", which may be:

  • the format used for publication dates in the article (see above);
  • the format expected in the citation style adopted in the article; or
  • yyyy-mm-dd

Or, to put it another way, you would have met the manual of style requirements by putting all the access and archive dates in yyyy-mm-dd format - which is the format that I prefer using in all circumstances, on the grounds that: it's concise, unambiguous, and not nation-specific.

Michael F 1967 (talk) 01:45, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Report for DXQM[edit]

Hi, Migfab008!

Can I ask questions about the report of Home Radio Cagayan de Oro. Will this radio station DXQM-FM changes its programming and reformatting for the relaunch of its new branding on January 30, 2023, amongst other Home Radio's provincial stations that will having a new flagship radio station of Aliw Broadcasting Corporation, or it still carries the Home Radio branding like its Cebu station?

Hoping that you'll answer. Thanks and more power to you! Trizailla Jemz (talk) 14:23, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Trizalla Jemz, it depends on the reliable source says. Migfab008 (talk) 14:34, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Short description[edit]

Yo. I reverted your change to the Panzer Dragoon Saga short description. Per WP:SHORTDESC, the genre is unnecessary in most cases. Thanks. Popcornfud (talk) 13:26, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

David Ho[edit]

Why you undid it? It just relocation and remove redundant repeat? It has lot of repeated sentences eg Chinese Engineering Academy. US National Academy etc. What's problem with you? 119.56.17.133 (talk) 11:30, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@119.56.17.133, This is not an improvement. This edit revision by 119.56.17.18 removes some content and it might have been disruptive. However, this edit by Lightoil was reverting his edits adequently. Migfab008 (talk) 11:37, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
why disrputive? actually both of you are disruptive. previously its has lots of repetition so hence removed. 119.56.17.133 (talk) 11:41, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, so if you say this edit is disruptive, I will not do it again. Hence, I am so sorry for that. If I disrupt Wikipedia unexpectedly, I would be blocked by editing. Sorry for that 119.56.17.133. I will not do it again disruptively. Migfab008 (talk) 11:44, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just be aware that you script changed armour to armor in the infobox. If the armour line was actually used on this page, it would probably have broken the infobox. Template:Infobox weapon does not indicate that armor can be substituted for armour. You may want to inspect other pages you have used the script on for this issue. Kylesenior (talk) 08:07, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will always respect the WP:ENGVAR as of now. Thank you Kylesenior for this message. I appreciate that. Migfab008 (talk) 08:11, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Script[edit]

Your script for fixing MOS:NUM can fix the dates of an article and adds the Philippine English template automatically. On my script, it cannot add the Philippine English template automatically, it only fixes the dates of an article. Is there missing on my scripts? SeanJ 2007 (talk) 06:31, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shortened footnotes[edit]

I noticed you removed {{Use shortened footnotes}} from at least two articles, Gregorian calendar and Pope Gregory XIII, and did not explain why. I notice both articles do in fact use shortened footnotes. Would you please explain your reasoning? Jc3s5h (talk) 11:38, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please be more careful[edit]

In this edit, you introduced a typo by changing the correctly-spelled derailment to "deraillment", changed the correctly-spelled proper noun Greyhound to "Grayhound", and changed cancelled to canceled when both are acceptable in American English. In summary, nothing you did here improved the article in any way. You need to be much less careless if you're going to be making edits like these all over the place. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 23:58, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I will be more carful. Migfab008 (talk) 08:37, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Another request to be careful - you changed "colour" in a template parameter to "color". --Golbez (talk) 13:57, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Using MOSNUM script to change citation dates (please don't)[edit]

Hi Migfaboo8, I have reverted your use of the MOSNUM script at 2023 United States East Coast wildfire smoke. As another editor has mentioned, YYYY-MM-DD is a valid format for references. Editing the dates in a reference provides no aesthetic improvements and impedes the translatability of Wikipedia.

I do not use this script, but I believe it is possible to turn off this function. I encourage you to do that. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! Wracking talk! 04:50, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Madeleine L'Engle, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Boyinaroom (talk) 10:18, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
You've earned it. Thanks for all your help. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 23:19, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation[edit]

Hello Migfab008!

  • The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
  • We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
  • Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
  • Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
  • If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:50, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]